The Tibetan plateau is the largest topographic feature on
Earth and is related to the ongoing collision between India and Eurasia that
began some 55 million years ago. Construction of the plateau began earlier with
the accretion of ocean island crustal blocks to the Eurasian continent in the
Jurassic, although the extreme topography likely wasn’t created until the
Cenozoic following the collision with India (see my earlier post about the debate over the timing
of uplift). How and when the plateau crust became thickened and elevated is a major debate in geology. Tapponnier et al. (2001) suggest that the collision with India resulted
in intracontinental subduction (“hidden plate tectonics”) of mantle lithosphere
of the previously accreted terranes.
Image from figure 3 from Tapponier et al. (2001). The authors caution
that the proposed continental subduction has not yet been imaged
geophysically.
Tapponier et al. (2001) suggest that the terranes act as
coherent blocks, contradicting other ideas of plateau growth that suggest the
Tibetan mantle lithosphere behaves more fluidly. They challenge an earlier
hypothesis put forth by mainly by Philip England and Gregory Houseman of a
“soft Tibet” that involves: a) the entire lithosphere thickening as a viscous sheet, b) eventual removal and sinking of this dense lithosphere into the asthenosphere, c) subsequent buoyant rise, and extension of the plateau.
Image from figure 9 of Molnar et al. (1993) showing convective
removal of the Tibetan lithosphere.
The debate often centers on determining of the timing
of plateau thickening vs. uplift and in the interpretation of the Late Miocene
to recent faulting that appears to be forcing the plateau crust eastward.
Tapponier et al. (2001) suggest that the observed extension by normal faulting due to
gravitational collapse is negligible, and that the lateral extension of the
plateau is largely occurring along strike slip faults, which are more in line
with the continental subduction hypothesis. How the plateau is deforming has strong
implications on the causes for the volumetrically minor, but widespread
potassic volcanism on the plateau. Tapponnier et al. further argue that the post-collisional volcanism is localized in three different belts that line up well with the continental subduction model, and not so much with wholesale removal of the lithospheric mantle. How continental subduction promotes melting is not addressed in this paper, but later researchers do and will be discussed here shortly.
Citations:
-->
T. M. Harrison, P. Copeland, W. S. F. Kidd, A. Yin, Science
255, 1663 (1992).
Molnar, P., P. England, and J. Martinod, Mantle dynamics,
the uplift of the Tibetan Plateau, and the Indian monsoon, Reviews of
Geophysics, 31, 357-396, 1993.
Tapponnier, P., Xu, Z.Q., Roger, F., Meyer, B., Arnaud, N.,
Wittlinger, G., and Yang, J.S., 2001, Oblique stepwise rise and growth of the
Tibet plateau: Science, v. 294, p. 1671–1677.
No comments:
Post a Comment